|
| ||
|
Red Bluff Daily News July 13, 2005 See Also: Document: Appeal of Inentec permit Red Bluff Daily News, 9/10/05: InEnTec appeal date set Red Bluff Daily News, 9/9/05: InEnTec opponents air their concerns For more information, contact:
|
S.F. group calls for more thorough review of InEnTec REBECCA WOLF-DN Staff Writer Company, county officials defend data RED BLUFF A San Francisco environmental group is asking for a more thorough environmental review for the proposed medical waste treatment facility south of Red Bluff. Bradley Angel, executive director of Greenaction for Health and Environmental Justice said that InEnTec Medical Services, LLC, has provided "questionable information" to the county regarding the new technology that will turn medical waste into power. " I believe that certain claims being made require more scrutiny," Angel said. "Almost nobody knows the full scope of what is being proposed here." A negative declaration,
a less intensive report than an environmental impact report, was
completed for the project,
and a 30-day review
and public comment period closed in December. County planning director George Robson could not be reached for comment on the environmental report Tuesday. Assistant air pollution control officer Gary Bovee said that the county determined that a negative declaration was sufficient based on the information provided by InEnTec. "We reviewed the process and health risk assessments," Bovee said. "... The risk is so low it doesn't trigger an EIR." He added
that the health risk was determined to be less than one
in a million, for those who breathe the air 24 hours
a day, for
70 years. The company treats medical waste with a plasma arc system at temperatures that exceed 2,000 degrees. The system either vaporizes the medical waste or produces glass. The waste is mostly paper, plastic and trash, but it has been exposed to people with diseases and must be handled according to strict regulations. Initially, the
facility will process 2 to 4 tons a day of medical waste generated
by Northern California
health
care
providers.
It may take
up to six months to reach full system capacity of
6 tons a day. Angel said the process uses an incinerator, which by state law requires an EIR. Bill Quapp, InEnTec director of project development, said that the unit was a plasma gasification unit that makes fuel where incinerators do not. " He chooses to mislabel information," Quapp said of Angel. "He's either lying or technically incompetent." Among what Angel calls questionable is the company's Web site that states that several treatment facilities are "already successfully operating." He claims that two of the sites have had problems with the systems. However, Quapp maintains that the systems did work and operate cleanly. He added that those systems were operated by other businesses that had other issues and said that the Red Bluff facility will be managed differently. " We will maintain operational responsibility," Quapp said. "We're taking all the risk. ... If it doesn't work or it pollutes beyond California standards, we shut down." Bovee said that even with the permits, the company will have to prove after construction that the system operates within acceptable parameters. "
It doesn't make sense for them to falsify information," Bovee
said. Angel said he has spent the past eight years working to protect communities from projects that could potentially impact public health. He said that his mother died at the age of 45 from breast cancer in what he calls a well-known cluster of breast cancer cases in Long Island. Angel said that Greenaction has stopped similar projects from going into communities in other states. "We just asked a couple of questions and the companies disappeared," he said. Quapp said he is aware of Greenaction's investigations elsewhere but said this is a different situation. "We have the data," Quapp said. "We have extensive data to back our claims." BACKGROUND: InEnTec is proposing building a hazardous waste treatment facility south of Red Bluff on Reading Road. The project is days away from receiving the final permits needed to begin construction in August. WHAT'S
NEW: A
San Francisco group, Greenaction for Health
and Environmental
Justice,
is asking for a
more thorough
environmental
review of
the project. |